watch / vigilantism

/.-jのそれっぽい投稿が興味深い．
[This post in /.-j is interesting for me.]

元の投稿は「監視者を逆に監視する」って話だけど，
「監視者を逆に監視する監視者を逆に監視する」，
「監視者を逆に監視する監視者を逆に監視する監視者を監視する」．．．
って事も出来るんだな，と．
[The post seems which said that.:
"Someone which are watching the others are watched by a others
in the others.", I think.
So, The kinds of acts as like that are able to do.:
"Someone which are watching the others are watched by a others
in the others, and they are watched by a anothers".
"Someone which are watching the others are watched by a others
in the others, and they are watched by a anothers,
and they are watched by a others in a anothers"...]

結局，「「監視する」人なら「監視者」」で一括りなんだろうケド，
「動機」が問題だよな，と．
その「動機が起きる動機」も，同じく一括りに「動機」と看做すなら，
自分はこれが重要だと思っている，少なくとも今の所は．
[Anyway,
The sets of "a man watched the others" are able to union
in same domain.
The unioned set is the only one set in the domain
which is decompose to some subsets which have each "vigilantism"s.
So, it is impoertant for me to do, IMHO, ATM.:
"why would you watch the others" or "why wouldn't do so".]

カントの本が今だに理解出来ていないので，
あまり偉そうなは言うべきでは無いけど． :P
[I have not understoond
what Kant said in his books still now.
So, mine is one of humble opnions. :P]