MeasureSLOC(&B2); /* more fork(3p) */

ボスが「来週からは例のブツを実機検証するから週末に合成しとけや，カス」（意味無く誇張）と仰られたのでモニョっている．
[My boss sez "n00b, synthesize your junk code to verify on the chip by this weekend, K?".]

で、PCが蝶頑張って論理合成している間にまたも無意味にSLOCをグラフ化．以前よりfork(3p)の症状が悪化しているモヨウ． :DDD
[So, while synthesizing my junk code, I made t3h SLOC graph again. ZOMG, it's fork(3p)-er than t3h previous one!!1 :DDD]

GentooJP.NomiKai += 2; /* HHK/TLUG */

trombikセンセーがlu_zero様一行とTLUGのミーティングに紛れ込むと仰ったので、amazon.co.jpなトコに行ってきた。プレゼン前に英語で自己紹介とかあって「ソンナノキイテナイヨ？」とか思ったが、テキトーに「Gentooをppcで使っているので、lu_zero様のお世話になっております」とか言って誤魔化した。 :P
[trombik sez "lu_zero is in Tokyo", so I spied TLUG meeting at t3h amazon.co.jp's office. Before presentaitons, I'd have to do self-introduction in English. Well, WTF? My line was "I'm a gentoo/ppc user, so I owe lu_zero!!1" :P]

で、ミーティングの内容はlibpasoriとdtraceの話だったけど、まー、英語だったので良く分からんかった。libpasoriの方は「ドキュメントが無いし、コードがマジックナンバーだらけだから良く分からん」とか言ってた気がする。dtraceの方は「実行時にインストラクションを書き換えるので、移植すんのは大変なんだ」とか言ってた気がする。
[The meetings are about libpasori and dtrace in English. So I can not understand what they're talking completely. But, IIRC, "libpasori has no documentation, and the code has ton of magic number", "To port dtrace is not easy b/c it needs to rewrite some OS/machine-depend instruction appropriately".]

で、"てんぐ"とか言うトコの飲み会では「Gentooのインストーラーは実験段階だ」とか「Bleachとか図書館戦争がイタリアで人気がある」とか「KDEじゃなくてawesome/wmii使え」とか「iKnowはFlashと使うべきではない」とか、ミーティングの内容と全然関係無い話題ばっか喋ってた。lu_zero様一行は広島観光に行く為に新幹線に乗るので飲み会の途中で離脱されました。
[NomiKai at Tengu, "Gentoo's installer is highly experimental", "Bleach and Library War rock in Italy", "No more KDE, use awesome/wmii", "iKnow shouldn't use Flash" or so, these are totally unrelated the presentations' topic though. Italy guys were leaving by ShinKanSen to go to HiroShima in mid of the NomiKai.]

で、二次会は"ほぶごぶりん"とか言うトコ。TLUGの中の人達がサーバの話題（英語）でexcitingしている横で、matsuuさんと鎖国しながらAndroidを弄くってたら、trombikセンセーがKojimaさんを教育的指導していたので、意味無く"yup, yup!!1"と連呼して有耶無耶にした。 :P
[Second at Hobgoblin. TLUG guys were exciting to discuss about server thingy. A few feet away, matsuu and I were poking Android to do SaKoku, national isolation. Seems like trombik likes to pressure Kojima, it was time to jeer w/ meaningless "yup, yup!!1". :P]

そう言えば、五月末にキーボード飲み会があったこと書いてなかったので今回は"+= 2"だ！！1 :)
[BTW, I completely forgot to blog about NomiKai of HHK at end of May, so I'd have to increment by "+= 2" here!!1 :)]

InheritEclass(owb-svn, subversion, cmake-utils);

DoduoがOWBのtrunkにぶちこまれたので、以前からモニョっていたsvn live ebuildをoverlayに突っ込む犯行計画を実行する。x11-wm/awesomeがcmakeに移行したと言う噂を耳にしていたので、「cmakeをebuildで使うGentooishな方法は？」とmatsuuさんに訊いたら、「cmake-utils.eclassをつかえや、カス」（意味なく誇張）と仰られたのでそうすることにした。 :)
[Doduo went into trunk, so it's time to make an svn live ebuild to fsck upstream for ricing. I've heard that x11-wm/awesome now use cmake, so I asked "Is there any Gentooish way to use cmake in a ebuild?", matsuu answered "n00b, do inherit cmake-utils.eclass."]

が、svn repoをpullってきたトコで走らせていたブツは、
[Well, I used an lazy build script at my ppc lap in pulled svn repos looks like,]

#!/bin/sh
cmake \
 -D BUILD_SHARED_LIBS="ON"                   \
 -D CMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE="ON"                \
 -D CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE="OFF"             \
 -D COMPILE_TESTS="ON"                       \
 -D OWBAL_BENCH_LOAD_TIME="OFF"              \
 -D OWBAL_PLATFORM_MACPORT="OFF"             \
 -D OWBAL_PLATFORM_GRAPHICS="SDL"            \
 -D WEBKIT_DEBUG="RELEASE"                   \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_CC_EXCEPTIONS="OFF"           \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_CC_PIC="ON"                   \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_CC_RTTI="OFF"                 \
 -D WEBKIT_OFFLINE_WEB_APPLICATIONS="ON"     \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_CROSS_DOCUMENT_MESSAGING="ON" \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_DASHBOARD="ON"                \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_DATABASE="ON"                 \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_DOM_STORAGE="ON"              \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_FILESYSTEM="POSIX"            \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_FONTS="FREETYPE"              \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_HTML5_VIDEO="OFF"             \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_I18N="ICU"                    \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_NPAPI="OFF"                   \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_SVG="ON"                      \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_SYSTEMTIME="LINUX"            \
 -D WEBKIT_USE_THREADING="PTHREADS"          \
 ../                                         \
 && make -k ;

で、cmake-utils.eclassはと言うと、
[OTOH, cmake-utils.eclass has these craps like,]

# @FUNCTION: cmake-utils_use_with
# @USAGE:  [flag name]
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Based on use_with. See ebuild(5).
#
# `cmake-utils_use_with foo FOO` echoes -DWITH_FOO=ON if foo is enabled
# and -DWITH_FOO=OFF if it is disabled.
cmake-utils_use_with() { _use_me_now WITH "$@" ; }

# @FUNCTION: cmake-utils_use_enable
# @USAGE:  [flag name]
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Based on use_enable. See ebuild(5).
#
# `cmake-utils_use_enable foo FOO` echoes -DENABLE_FOO=ON if foo is enabled
# and -DENABLE_FOO=OFF if it is disabled.
cmake-utils_use_enable() { _use_me_now ENABLE "$@" ; }

# @FUNCTION: cmake-utils_use_want
# @USAGE:  [flag name]
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Based on use_enable. See ebuild(5).
#
# `cmake-utils_use_want foo FOO` echoes -DWANT_FOO=ON if foo is enabled
# and -DWANT_FOO=OFF if it is disabled.
cmake-utils_use_want() { _use_me_now WANT "$@" ; }

# @FUNCTION: cmake-utils_has
# @USAGE:  [flag name]
# @DESCRIPTION:
# Based on use_enable. See ebuild(5).
#
# `cmake-utils_has foo FOO` echoes -DHAVE_FOO=ON if foo is enabled
# and -DHAVE_FOO=OFF if it is disabled.
cmake-utils_has() { _use_me_now HAVE "$@" ; }

なので、「cmake-utils.eclass、つかえねー」とほざいた所、「OWBのオプションがタコなんだよ、カス」（意味なく誇張）とmatsuuさんが宣われたので、upstream devを#owb@freenode.netで叩く事にした。 :)
[So I'd have to say "OMGWTF, cmake-utils.eclass suck0rz!!1", then matsuu sez "It's OWB's cmake opts' faults. Fix0r ASAP!!1". So I'd have to smack t3h upstream devs at #owb.]

07/04 01:12:12 hiyuh
    devs, I'm now poking own-svn ebuild to migrate w/ cmake-utils.eclass
    on my gentoo.
07/04 01:12:33 hiyuh
    but owb's cmake options has inconsistencies WRT thier name, it's
    pain to me.
07/04 01:12:41 hiyuh
    even if I migrate the ebuild w/ cmake-utils.eclass, it can't get
    any benefit from USE flags.
07/04 01:12:46 hiyuh
    b/c the eclass can handle -D{WITH,ENABLE,WANT,HAVE}_*, ATM.
07/04 01:13:08 hiyuh
    owb doesn't use any -D{WITH,ENABLE,WANT,HAVE}_*.
07/04 01:13:38 hiyuh
    is there any plan to clean up cmake options' name?
07/04 01:22:03 [Oliv]
    If that's usefull to use cmake-utils eclass facilities... YES !!!
07/04 01:23:40 hiyuh
    [Oliv]: then how can I purge owb's cmake opts to be cmake-utils.eclass
    friendly? :)
07/04 01:24:58 [Oliv]
    Well I think that I should first have a look at cmake-utils to have
    a more precise idea of what must be done
07/04 01:28:12 hiyuh
    k, so first of all, we need t3h ticket to consider? :)
07/04 01:28:51 [Oliv]
    either we use the ticket related to cmake clean or we can create a
    new one
07/04 01:30:10 hiyuh
    oic, then I'll check the ticket for cmake clean.
07/04 01:30:29 [Oliv]
    I had a look at cmake-utils eclass... and the major problem will be
    to remove non boolean options :S
07/04 01:31:46 hiyuh
    #210?
07/04 01:32:01 [Oliv]
    yes... but in fact no
07/04 01:32:13 [Oliv]
    I think that creating a new one is better
07/04 01:32:30 hiyuh
    k
07/04 01:35:01 [Oliv]
    things that will be easy to modify are option like WEBKIT_DEBUG
07/04 01:35:25 [Oliv]
    which should become something like ENABLE_DEBUG
07/04 01:36:28 [Oliv]
    'cause I had a feedback today about DEBUG_GCC3.X which is now
    probably useless...
07/04 01:37:00 [Oliv]
    compilation seems ok without it if you use a gcc-3.x
07/04 01:37:53 [Oliv]
    the annoying part will probably be: OWBAL_PLATFORM_GRAPHICS
07/04 01:43:22 hiyuh
    separate WITH_OWBAL_PLATFORM_GRAPHICS_GTK=[ON or OFF] and
    WITH_OWBAL_PLATFORM_GRAPHICS_SDL=[ON or OFF], and enable the one
    upstream prefered by default. if both ones are ON, build both
    ones (or, only latter's like unixy command opt?)
07/04 01:45:48 [Oliv]
    Well I think that if you compile both, you will get some "redefined"
    symbols
07/04 01:46:24 [Oliv]
    I think that in this case we have to use CMAKE_DEPENDENT_OPTION
07/04 01:46:57 [Oliv]
    it is easy to manage if you only have 2 possibilities in graphics
07/04 01:47:21 [Oliv]
    but it is planned to integrate amiga os implementation in owb
07/04 01:47:37 hiyuh
    zomg, amiga :DDD
07/04 01:47:39 [Oliv]
    so it will do a third possibility for graphics
07/04 01:52:07 [Oliv]
    I will have to do some tests to know if it is easy to manage such
    a case

つーことで、取り合えず、ticket #254を作っておいた。つづく、多分。 :P
[So, ticket #254 was issued by me. ASSIGNED WORKINPROGRESS(tm), prolly. :P]